AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Bible discovery turkey1/7/2024 So this supposed Bible cannot be either a true Bible or a true “original” Injil (i.e. But both Muslims and Christians agree that the Messiah is named Jesus. It contains a prophecy stating that the Messiah will be named Mohammed. Thirdly, this supposed Bible is erroneous. So there is no way that this supposed Bible could have been written before 1840. The date it was supposedly written (1500 AD) is inscribed on the front cover.īut this supposed Bible is written in Modern Assyrian. The Turkish government said it was 1500 years old, but the document itself says it was written in the year 1500. This supposed Bible is not 1500 years old. Thanks for dropping by and taking the time to comment. No wonder the Turkish Theology professor Omer Faruk Harman told said the Turkish Newspaper Today’s Zaman, “ Muslims may be disappointed to see that this copy does not include things they would like to see and it might have no relation with the content of the Gospel of Barnabas“. The most I can say about this book other than being an ancient manuscript of somebody’s writing – it should not be seriously considered as anything more than another discovery of ancient rubbish. I’m sorry for those who believe this book is the authentic written word of Jesus, peace be upon him. The Islamic article goes on to describe other contradictions between the document and The Qu’ran and then closes with a quote from Yusuf Estes, the well-known Islamic scholar, who rejects the document as follows: Yet, The Qu’ran says that Messiah is the name of Jesus, NOT the name of Mohammed. In late 2012 the Turkish culture and tourism minister Ertugrul Gunay quoted from the book saying that in it, Jesus says, “How shall the Messsiah be called? Muhammad is his Blessed name”. The Islamic website Islamic NewsRoom describes how the document contradicts The Qu’ran as follows (see Secondly, this document has been rejected as a fake by Islamic scholars. More to the point, a document written in 1840 cannot possibly be said to predict the coming of Mohammed in 610 AD.įrom this alone, the language that the document was written in, we therefore know that this document is an obvious fake. it would have been written in Classical Assyrian, not Modern Assyrian. The first bible in Modern Assyrian was produced in 1848. The language Modern Assyrian, was standardized in the 1840s. The text on the front cover has appeared in many photographs and is easily read in the Modern Assyrian language.īut the fact that the document was written in Modern Assyrian proves that the document is actually less than 200 years old. We know that the document was written in 1500 AD because it says so on the front cover. which would make it about 500 years old, not 1500 years old. The document itself says it was written in the year 1500 A.D. This supposed ‘Bible’ is an obvious fake.įirstly, the document was not written 1500 years ago. You can read the report, which describes a 1500-2000 year old Bible seized from smugglers by Turkish police here. 23 2012 by the National Turkish news service. The basis for this belief is a story published on Feb. ![]() ![]() ![]() Some Muslims believe that the supposed original, real Bible, which supports the teaching of The Qu’ran, was discovered in the year 2000 in Turkey. Muslims believe that Christians falsified and destroyed the real Bible, often asserting that this occurred at The Council Of Nicea in 325 AD.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |